[Devel] fixing flushing of TX not working on rollback

This commit is contained in:
Robert von Burg 2015-02-03 23:19:29 +01:00
parent b0cf516dab
commit a9f3b04b3f
2 changed files with 19 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ public abstract class AbstractTransaction implements StrolchTransaction {
private TransactionResult txResult;
private List<Command> commands;
private List<Command> flushedCommands;
private Set<StrolchRootElement> lockedElements;
private AuditingOrderMap orderMap;
@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ public abstract class AbstractTransaction implements StrolchTransaction {
this.certificate = certificate;
this.commands = new ArrayList<>();
this.flushedCommands = new ArrayList<>();
this.lockedElements = new HashSet<>();
this.closeStrategy = TransactionCloseStrategy.ROLLBACK;
this.txResult = new TransactionResult(getRealmName(), System.nanoTime(), new Date());
@ -470,7 +472,6 @@ public abstract class AbstractTransaction implements StrolchTransaction {
validateCommands();
doCommands();
writeChanges(this.txResult);
this.commands.clear();
} catch (Exception e) {
this.closeStrategy = TransactionCloseStrategy.ROLLBACK;
@ -773,8 +774,12 @@ public abstract class AbstractTransaction implements StrolchTransaction {
* so chance of a runtime exception should be small
*/
private void doCommands() {
for (Command command : this.commands) {
ListIterator<Command> iter = this.commands.listIterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
Command command = iter.next();
command.doCommand();
this.flushedCommands.add(command);
iter.remove();
}
}
@ -783,8 +788,11 @@ public abstract class AbstractTransaction implements StrolchTransaction {
* performing the commands
*/
private void undoCommands() {
for (Command command : this.commands) {
ListIterator<Command> iter = this.flushedCommands.listIterator();
while (iter.hasPrevious()) {
Command command = iter.previous();
command.undo();
iter.remove();
}
}
}

View File

@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ import li.strolch.command.RemoveResourceCommand;
import li.strolch.model.ModelGenerator;
import li.strolch.model.Resource;
import li.strolch.persistence.api.StrolchTransaction;
import li.strolch.persistence.api.TransactionCloseStrategy;
import li.strolch.service.api.AbstractService;
import li.strolch.service.api.ServiceArgument;
import li.strolch.service.api.ServiceResult;
@ -58,6 +57,8 @@ public class FlushTxTest extends AbstractRealmServiceTest {
tx.addCommand(rmResCmd);
tx.flush();
DBC.PRE.assertNull("Expect to remove resource with id " + id, tx.getResourceBy(id, id));
tx.commitOnClose();
}
return ServiceResult.success();
@ -89,13 +90,16 @@ public class FlushTxTest extends AbstractRealmServiceTest {
DBC.PRE.assertNotNull("Expected resource with id " + id, tx.getResourceBy(id, id));
// now force a rollback
tx.setCloseStrategy(TransactionCloseStrategy.ROLLBACK);
tx.rollbackOnClose();
}
// now make sure the new resource does not exist
try (StrolchTransaction tx = openTx(arg.realm)) {
DBC.PRE.assertNull("Did not expect resource with id after rolling back previous TX " + id,
tx.getResourceBy(id, id));
Resource res = tx.getResourceBy(id, id);
if (res != null) {
throw tx.fail("Did not expect resource with id after rolling back previous TX " + id);
}
}
return ServiceResult.success();